Which intervention is NOT appropriate for a client at risk of self-harm?

Enhance your preparation for the ATI Comprehensive Predictor Exam with our retake test. Dive into interactive questions with detailed explanations to boost your confidence and increase your chances of success!

The intervention of allowing unrestricted access to personal belongings is not appropriate for a client at risk of self-harm because it may provide the client with access to items that could be used to inflict harm on themselves. In situations where a client has suicidal ideation or a history of self-injurious behavior, it is crucial to minimize their opportunity to access potentially dangerous items, such as sharp objects, medications, or tools that could facilitate self-harm.

In contrast, one-on-one supervision serves as a safeguard, helping to ensure that the client does not engage in harmful behavior during vulnerable moments. Documenting the client's behavior is an essential aspect of monitoring their mental state and can inform treatment plans. Ensuring that medications are swallowed is also vital to prevent overdose or misuse, thereby contributing to the client's safety and overall well-being. Each of these interventions helps create a supportive and secure environment that is crucial for clients at risk of self-harm.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy